Budget Clarifications are Needed
|
3:26 PM
|
|||
|
Greg,
On behalf of the A&B Advisory Board let me thank you and Wayne and Stella for the fortitude you displayed in working through the budget material at last evenings meeting.
I believe our efforts will have been a great dress rehearsal for Council’s budget session this Saturday, as your staff develops answers and analysis to the questions posed in hopes of furthering public confidence in the budget process.
1) Employee names need to be reinserted in to the personnel budget for ease of working with same. Employee salaries are a matter of public record that have been disclosed without exception in the past, AND Port Orange does not need any more – what are you hiding speculation.
2) Please break out and supply the authority for all budgeted expenditures under the heading ICMA & Other Pension Contributions
3) Please total and disclose the budgeted expenditures for Sick and Vacation in the Personnel projections.
4) Please disclose the total budgeted expenditure for the General Employees pension plan.
5) Please provide reconciliations between the required pension plan payments as contained in the Annual Actuarial reports for all 3 Defined Benefits Plans AND the pension expenditures you are budgeting.
6) Please provide details on the 2.5% salary increase you are recommending for non collective bargaining employees, AND whether such raises are proposed for employees in DROP also.
7) Please provide an action plan and analysis in support of your budgeted $50,000 clean-up/legal assistance bonus for code enforcement.
8) Your recommendation to eliminate the Director of Public Safety position and the savings accompanying that consolidation which was only accomplished 2 years appears to be being made for un-stated reasons. The public whose property tax millage will be based on such increased expenditures deserve a detailed explanation as to why this position has failed if it has indeed failed. Additionally Fire and Police expenditures are being budgeted to increase 19% and 11% respectively. Expenditure growths of this magnitude are not sustainable.
9) Please provide an analysis in support of those major revenue sources such as Property Tax and Water and Sewer fees where-in you are budgeting lower revenues in FY 2014 than were actually received in FY 2012
10) Please provide a detailed analysis of the assigned reserves for police, fire, and general employment retirement costs noted on P 8
11) Please provide the calculation indicating that a millage reduction from 4.8051 to 4.6991 equates to a property tax reduction of $244,787 as has been stated in recent e-mails.
12 ) The FY 2012 Actual numbers contained in the budget need to agree with the 2012 CAFR ‘audited’ numbers and where they do not a reconciliation needs to be provided.
Several times last evening it was intimidated that the complexity that is Port Orange finance frequently makes explanations difficult to understand. That is unacceptable poppy cock and I would remind you that for several years running the former Auditor noted in his comments that:
This condition ( inconsistent account codes and descriptions) is further complicated by the expanded use of multiple operating funds which are ultimately consolidated and rolled-up into other major operating funds for financial reporting purposes.
The use of multiple funds, many of which are for insignificant financial activities, severely complicates the budgetary and financial reporting processes throughout the year, and especially at year-end.
This recommendation needs to be dusted off and implemented ASAP and I would urge you to update Council with specifics regarding your efforts in this regard. The purpose of all of this is not meant to be the comfort of the manager or any of his staff but rather the ability of the people and their representatives to inquire and understand with reasonable effort.
That is not how finance has been run for at least the past decade and that needs to change.
Thank you
Ted Noftall
Chairman
A&B Advisory Board